What should we be hoarding as the Maga universe learns how tariffs work?

Search

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens
Funny if you just click picture it expands to full view ?
I never get the full picture
Maybe it's just my end
No problems

1000013638.png
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
19,640
Tokens
The big beautiful bill isn't fiscal conservatism, its quite the opposite. No fiscal conservative would add to the ballooning debt the way this bill will.

The party of traditional conservatism is gone, long gone.
Republicans have supported government spending just as much as Democrats for 40+ years.

When politicians say "reduce/eliminate the deficit", what they are really trying to do is slow the rate of the deficit's growth

But this bill will even fail to do that, and even do the opposite. $2.2 trillion per year added to the deficit.

That wouldn't be the case if they slashed military spending in half from the proposed amount, but apparently saving $500 billion isn't "fiscally conservative"
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,964
Tokens
Republicans have supported government spending just as much as Democrats for 40+ years.

When politicians say "reduce/eliminate the deficit", what they are really trying to do is slow the rate of the deficit's growth

But this bill will even fail to do that, and even do the opposite. $2.2 trillion per year added to the deficit
.

That wouldn't be the case if they slashed military spending in half from the proposed amount, but apparently saving $500 billion isn't "fiscally conservative"

Because the CBO says so . See their 2017 prediction on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act . They only swung and missed by a full point on GDP .
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens
Looking for the people who are suppose to be hoarding something as the Maga universe learns how tariffs work?

1000013635.gif
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
15,952
Tokens
You're really hung up on the word Hoarding ....

You not understanding "innuendo" ( you'll probably need to look this up) isn't surprising.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
88,181
Tokens
Republicans have supported government spending just as much as Democrats for 40+ years.

When politicians say "reduce/eliminate the deficit", what they are really trying to do is slow the rate of the deficit's growth

But this bill will even fail to do that, and even do the opposite. $2.2 trillion per year added to the deficit.

That wouldn't be the case if they slashed military spending in half from the proposed amount, but apparently saving $500 billion isn't "fiscally conservative"

You cite the CBO, who's been categorically incorrect about every prediction they ever made (there may be an exception, "maybe"). If they were accurate about anything, then democrats would have legislated utopia by now.

The most important thing we can do is grow the economy, encourage investments to create new jobs, increase real wages. The policies the right espouses are much better at that. We the people, and private enterprises, are the solutions. Joe Biden, AOC, Chucky and Nancy are economic illiterates. Government is not the solution

When are lefties, and greenfruit you are once again talking like a leftie, going to recognize the truth? Will they ever grow up? Will they ever understand the nuances of the truth?

The right has a bunch of idiots too, and all career politicians must go. Stated differently, "drain the swamp". Your boys, the swamp, are kicking and screaming. They love getting rich and lying, and you're enabling them
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens
1000013668.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens

Trans athlete AB Hernandez wins 2 Calif. H.S. jumping events.​

Good article for the libtards
CLOVIS, Calif. -- A transgender athlete bested the competition Saturday at the California high school track and field championships to take home gold in the girls' high jump and the triple jump at a meet that has stirred controversy and drawn national attention.
AB Hernandez competed under a new rule change that might be the first of its kind nationally by a high school sports governing body.
Hernandez finished the high jump with a mark of 5 feet, 7 inches, with no failed attempts. Co-winners Jillene Wetteland and Lelani Laruelle also cleared that height after each logged a failed attempt. The three shared the first-place win, smiling as they stepped together onto the podium.
Hernandez, a junior at Jurupa Valley High School, wrapped up the night with a first-place finish in the triple jump, sharing the top spot with Kira Gant Hatcher, who trailed by just over a half-meter.
Earlier in the afternoon, Hernandez placed second in the long jump.
Olympians Marion Jones and Tara Davis-Woodhall previously set state championship records in the long jump in 1993 and 2017, respectively, both surpassing 22 feet. This year's winner, Loren Webster, topped 21 feet, with Hernandez trailing by a few inches.
Webster, a senior from Wilson High School, told the Los Angeles Times that she focused only on her performance and didn't give Hernandez much thought.
"It wasn't any other person I was worried about," Webster said. "I knew what I was capable of. I can't control the uncontrollable."
The California Interscholastic Federation announced the new policy earlier this week in response to Hernandez's success heading into the championships. Under the policy, the federation allowed an additional student to compete and medal in the events where Hernandez qualified.
The two-day championship kicked off Friday in sweltering heat at a high school near Fresno. Temperatures reached the triple digits during Saturday's finals.
The atmosphere was relatively quiet despite critics -- including parents, conservative activists and President Donald Trump -- calling for Hernandez to be barred from competing. Some critics wore pink bracelets and T-shirts that read, "Save Girls' Sports."
During Friday's qualifying events, an aircraft circled above the stadium for more than an hour with a banner: "No Boys in Girls' Sports!" Two groups that oppose transgender athletes participating in women's sports -- the Independent Council on Women's Sports and Women Are Real -- took credit for flying the banner.
The federation's rule change reflected efforts to find a middle ground in the debate over trans girls' participation in youth sports.
"The CIF values all of our student-athletes and we will continue to uphold our mission of providing students with the opportunity to belong, connect, and compete while complying with California law," the group said in a statement after announcing its rule change.
The federation announced the change after Trump threatened to pull federal funding from California unless it bars trans girls from competing on girls' teams. The federation said it decided on the change before then.
The U.S. Department of Justice also said it would investigate the federation and the district that includes Hernandez's high school to determine whether they violated federal sex discrimination law.
California law allows trans students to compete on sex-segregated sports teams consistent with their gender identity.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
19,640
Tokens
You cite the CBO, who's been categorically incorrect about every prediction they ever made (there may be an exception, "maybe"). If they were accurate about anything, then democrats would have legislated utopia by now.

The most important thing we can do is grow the economy, encourage investments to create new jobs, increase real wages. The policies the right espouses are much better at that. We the people, and private enterprises, are the solutions. Joe Biden, AOC, Chucky and Nancy are economic illiterates. Government is not the solution

When are lefties, and greenfruit you are once again talking like a leftie, going to recognize the truth? Will they ever grow up? Will they ever understand the nuances of the truth?

The right has a bunch of idiots too, and all career politicians must go. Stated differently, "drain the swamp". Your boys, the swamp, are kicking and screaming. They love getting rich and lying, and you're enabling them
Out of curiosity — if the deficit increases by $1.9 trillion or 2.5 trillion a year instead, will the CBO still be wrong? The $2.2 trillion per year figure will change because it’s a 10-year projection and the Democrats are almost sure going to get a chance to enforce their own agenda in that time frame.

What I said is that GOP has not run away from government spending for decades now, which is undeniably true.

I tend to agree with you about the essence of solutions. Obviously the government is gonna have their role in all of that too by necessity
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
102,700
Tokens
1000013702.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
19,640
Tokens
You cite the CBO, who's been categorically incorrect about every prediction they ever made (there may be an exception, "maybe"). If they were accurate about anything, then democrats would have legislated utopia by now.

The most important thing we can do is grow the economy, encourage investments to create new jobs, increase real wages. The policies the right espouses are much better at that. We the people, and private enterprises, are the solutions. Joe Biden, AOC, Chucky and Nancy are economic illiterates. Government is not the solution

When are lefties, and greenfruit you are once again talking like a leftie, going to recognize the truth? Will they ever grow up? Will they ever understand the nuances of the truth?

The right has a bunch of idiots too, and all career politicians must go. Stated differently, "drain the swamp". Your boys, the swamp, are kicking and screaming. They love getting rich and lying, and you're enabling them
And as far as projections go, they’re not an exact science

I will make projections all the time at work. For example I’ll try to project revenues/expenses/net income/margin etc for several periods — usually as far out as 5 years.

The point of projections aren’t to try and hit a bullseye, but give leadership an understanding of where the company is going if they operate as is. It’s supposed to help them guide their decision-making

Obviously in economic or business projections there are so many variables/unknowns that make it nearly impossible to nail down as an exact science
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,126,871
Messages
13,689,045
Members
102,382
Latest member
nhacaimcw7777
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com